summary of response: “no comment”
Originally posted on Levant Report:
ON FRIDAY, MAY 22, I contacted the DIA Public Affairs office seeking official response to my May 19 article entitled, 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”. DIA Public Affairs did not respond at that time.
YESTERDAY (5/26), THE DIA CONTACTED ME via email and requested that I submit my questions. Today, May 27, DIA Public Affairs spokesman James M. Kudla contacted me via telephone at 1:37pm (Eastern Standard Time) and agreed to give an official DIA comment to my questions concerning the declassified 2012 DIA intelligence report released through Freedom of Information Act request to Judicial Watch (14-L-0552/DIA/287-293).
THE BELOW IS A FULL TRANSCRIPT of the phone interview. Permission is given by Levant Report to freely copy and circulate.*
James Kudla [JK]: In response to the questions you submitted through email… As noted…
View original 397 more words
US policy knowingly contributed to rise of ISIS.
Sad and shameful
[Medium, via Zerohedge]
Incidentally the event that inspired me to start this blog was the Obama administration’s second attempt to overthrow the Syrian government, with complete and utter disregard for the side effects.
Originally posted on Phil Ebersole's Blog:
The World Trade Organization has overruled a U.S. law requiring that imported meat be labeled as to its country of origin.
The law gives an unfair advantage to domestic livestock breeders and meat processors, the WTO said.
Now the WTO is in the process of deciding what retaliatory tariffs can be imposed by Canada and Mexico if the United States does not repeal the law.
This is a sample of what can be expected if Congress approves the Trans Pacific Partnership or Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreements.
The mechanism is different in the TPP and TTIP, but the purpose is the same. Under the investor-state dispute settlement processes in these agreements, a panel of arbitrators could fine a government whose laws supposedly treated a foreign investor unfairly. The government would have the choice of paying the fine or repealing the law.
It might be good to have a trade…
View original 71 more words
So I’ve been tooling around the peanut gallery over at Project Syndicate. Actually not too bad for a venue for distributing policy-marketing material from establishment celebs. Thought this one was interesting – both the text and the especially some of comments (not mine, I have too much of an axe to grind!) – for bringing out several different ways to analyze the meaning of liberal democracy, which just so happens to be a central piece of the current talking point vocabulary, kind of like the words “credibility” and “legitimacy” were a year ago.