an important distinction…
In a post from October 2015, “Democratic Disappointments, Authoritarian Reformists, and Political Equilibria,” I mused about a seemingly ironic feature of contemporary Malaysian politics. The former dictator Mahathir Mohamad, a staunch defender of ruling party hegemony who happily jailed opponents to his regime, has emerged as one of the key critics of Najib Tun Razak. I suggested that the focus on Mahathir’s potential “change of heart” is entirely misplaced. Such a focus, I argued,
…reflects a common belief that the views of individual elites are central to understanding the essence of a country’s politics. There are lots of people who demand reform and openness in Malaysia, but when Mahathir does, this clearly changes the game. This belief in turn draws on a common view that the problem of political reform is getting the right people with the right beliefs in office. That is why it is…
View original post 425 more words
Caught a bit of CNN at a restaurant today at lunch. Left side of the screen: 2-4 heads talking. Right side of the screen: empty podium where “Trump may speak within the next 1-2 hours”… <sigh> … Same ratings game as during the election. I’m really starting to think the whole media feud, the networks’ part in the so-called “resistance”, is kayfabe. Or it may as well be.
Tariq Ali, 30 minute video. Much of it devoted to a country-by-country review of Europe.
[via Dandelion Salad]
audio only link (currently locked out, TODO: sub above when it is)