Democrats’ opportunity with the working class [Stanley Greenberg / American Prospect]
link: http://prospect.org/article/democrats%E2%80%99-%E2%80%98working-class-problem%E2%80%99
[via NC]
I can’t help but notice some ways how the D party manages to consistently put itself at a disadvantage. This is even aside from the hypocrisy that comes with the corporate wing of the D party. A big part of it is the common “moral framing” of the D party vs R party, which this article lays out in the usual way.
Take the most basic motivator, economic well being. The dreaded “distributional issues”.
Filtered through the lens of D party moral framing, to those who believe they lack upward mobility, what comes out is a thinly veiled classist system. Depending on how a disaffected voter defines the outclass he or she belongs to, this may work for the D party. If so, it would create traction for the positive things the D party has to offer, namely progress on social issues. But more often, especially where the votes really count, the outclass is defined in a way that goes against the D party, and any such traction is negated.
The two problematic dimensions are geography (urban vs rural voters), and education (voters without a college degree). The dynamic here has some pieces that were on full display this election cycle, I think.
(1) the US political system deliberately gives a significantly higher weighting to the “interior”
(2) self selection by education – if educated you are likely to move into a location where your vote makes less difference in national politics
(3) self-perpetuating wealth and income inequality, which acts in parallel to the self selection by education and reinforces it.
(4) the 2-party system in the US and its sponsors actively exploit this to lock in the status quo
(5) In the absence of third parties to stimulate a genuinely dynamic political system capable of change (positive or otherwise), the system is further discredited, which ironically helps lock it in place to the benefit of its sponsors.
